Clinical impact of second pathology opinion: a longitudinal study of central genitourinary pathology review before prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical impact of pathology review before prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Original and reviewing pathologists' reports were retrospectively collected from 1323 men treated with prostate brachytherapy between July 1998 and October 2005 at one institution. Statistical analysis was performed pre- and post-January 2002. The clinical impact of pathology review was evaluated. RESULTS: Gleason Score (GS) change (GS(Delta)) occurred in 25.2% (334) of cases; GS increased in 21.6%, decreased in 2.4%, and diagnosed malignancy in 1.2% of cases. Post-2002, concordance in attributed GS improved, with GS(Delta) of 31.9-20.6%, respectively (p<0.001), and a reduction in the average GS(Delta) (p<0.001). The clinical impact was substantial with management changing in 14.8% of cases. CONCLUSION: Concordance between the original and reviewing pathologists' GS has improved during the study period. Nevertheless, discordance persists in one of five cases. Pathology review remains essential, if treatment decisions hinge on GS.

Salvage radiation therapy for prostate specific antigen progression following radical prostatectomy: 10-year outcome estimates.

PURPOSE: We evaluated men treated with salvage radiation therapy for increasing serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) following radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 3,478 consecutive men who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) between 1983 and 2003, as performed by a single surgeon. A total of 307 men received salvage radiation therapy for persistently increased or increasing PSA after RRP. We compared perioperative and peri-radiotherapy clinicopathological parameters in men who achieved an undetectable PSA level after radiation therapy (responders) vs those who did not (nonresponders). We then evaluated the durability of the PSA response. RESULTS: Median time from RRP to PSA progression was 23 months (range 1 to 129). Median followup from RRP was 104 months (range 7 to 225). Median followup from salvage radiotherapy was 56 months (range 0 to 188). Of 223 men with sufficient followup information 162 (73%) subsequently had undetectable PSA (less than 0.3 ng/ml) in response to salvage radiation therapy. There was no significant difference between responders and nonresponders in the distribution of clinical and pathological tumor stages, age at RRP, surgical margin status, and the interval between RRP and salvage radiation therapy. A Gleason score of 8 to 10 was more prevalent in nonresponders than responders (28% vs 13%). Median PSA at salvage radiation therapy was 1.2 ng/ml in nonresponders vs 0.7 ng/ml in responders. Actuarial 5 and 10-year progression-free (PSA less than 0.3 ng/ml) survival probabilities in all 223 men following salvage radiation therapy were 40% (95% CI 32 to 48) and 25% (95% CI 15 to 36), respectively. Actuarial 5 and 10-year biochemical progression-free survival estimates following salvage radiation therapy in responders only were 55% (95% CI 45 to 64) and 35% (95% CI 21 to 49), respectively. Only seminal vesicle invasion was significantly associated with progression-free survival following radiation therapy on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: An undetectable PSA level following salvage radiation therapy is more frequently achieved in men with lower pre-radiation serum PSA and those without seminal vesicle or lymph node involvement. Overall approximately a fourth of men with PSA evidence of cancer progression following RRP had a durable response 10 years after the initiation of salvage radiation therapy in the protocols used in this patient cohort.

Alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase (P504S): overview and potential uses in diagnostic pathology as applied to prostate needle biopsies.

The diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma remains dependent on the recognition of basic haematoxylin and eosin criteria. The discovery of alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase/P504S (AMACR/P504S) overexpression in prostate cancer represents a triumph of high throughput microarray technology, and is a powerful demonstration of how this methodology can be used to facilitate the rapid development of diagnostically relevant antibodies. Immunohistochemistry with anti-AMACR/P504S is useful for detecting prostate cancer in the full range of prostate specimens encountered in surgical pathology, be they needle biopsies, transurethral resection of prostate chips, or prostatectomies. In particular, studies to date with AMACR/P504S clearly demonstrate the ability of this marker to support a diagnosis of malignancy in prostate needle biopsies. This is particularly true when it is combined with negative staining for a basal cell marker, such as 34betaE12 or p63. Although it has limitations with respect to sensitivity and specificity, AMACR/P504S will no doubt become a standard adjunctive stain used by pathologists seeking to reach a definitive diagnosis in prostate biopsies considered to be atypical, but not diagnostic of malignancy on haematoxylin and eosin sections alone.

El efecto de la radioterapia en la histopatología de la próstata y la determinación del cáncer residual / Effect of radiotherapy on prostate histopathology and assessement of residual cancer

En la hiperplasia y en el cáncer de próstata se producen cambios sustanciales y característicos de imagen microscópica en inmunofenotipo tras bloqueo androgénico y radioterapia. Estos cambios se observan muy raramente en el cáncer no tratado y, en nuestra experiencia, la combinación de hallazgos posradioterapia son suficientemente típicos como para que los patólogos los reconozcan. Los patólogos deben aprender a reconocer estos hallazgos, que difieren de los habituales criterios de reconocer el cáncer en base al tamaño nuclear y nucleolar, en especial en muestras de tejido pequeñas y en metástasis ganglionares. Los clínicos deben conocer también las dificultades inherentes a esta interpretación (AU)

Prevalence and distribution of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in salvage radical prostatectomy specimens after radiation therapy.

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the most likely precursor of prostate cancer. The effect of radiation therapy (RT) on the prevalence of PIN is uncertain. We studied 86 patients who underwent salvage radical prostatectomy after irradiation failure at the Mayo Clinic. The prevalence, volume, multicentricity, spatial proximity to cancer, and architectural patterns of PIN were evaluated. High-grade PIN was identified in 53 (62%) of 86 prostatectomy specimens. Multiple architectural patterns were usually observed, including tufting in 87%, micropapillary in 66%, cribriform in 38%, and flat in 17%. The mean volume of PIN was 0.12 cm3 (range, 0.05-1.20 cm3). PIN was usually multicentric (70%), with a mean number of PIN foci of 2.5 (range, 1-10). Ninety-four percent of PIN foci were located within 2 mm of invasive cancer. There was no correlation between PIN and pathologic stage, surgical margin, tumor size, DNA ploidy, post-RT Gleason score, time interval from RT to biopsy-proven recurrence, postoperative prostate-specific antigen level, distant metastasis-free survival, or cancer-specific survival. Our examination of salvage radical prostatectomy specimens indicated that the prevalence and extent of PIN appeared to be reduced after RT compared to published studies of prostatectomies without prior RT.

Androgen receptors in untreated and treated prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

OBJECTIVES: The effect of androgen deprivation therapy on the expression of androgen receptors (AR) and the proliferation-associated MIB-1 antigen in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) was investigated. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry was performed on tissue sections of prostatectomy specimens of patients with prostate cancer who either were not treated prior to surgery or received androgen blockade therapy for 3 months. Immunohistochemistry on slides, selected for the presence of PIN was performed with an AR-specific monoclonal antibody and MIB-1 using a microwave antigen-retrieval method. RESULTS: AR expression was present in a majority of cells in PIN of both untreated and treated prostatectomy specimens. In addition, a proportion of normal prostatic glandular cells retained AR expression. The basal cells in both untreated and treated PIN did not express AR. MIB-1-positive cells were identified in PIN of untreated and treated cases. CONCLUSIONS: PIN lesions that persist after 3 months of androgen deprivation therapy continue to express AR and may therefore retain the potential to expand after cessation of this therapy.

Influence of irradiation and androgen ablation on prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

OBJECTIVES: Although irradiation and endocrine therapy have been used in the treatment of prostatic carcinoma for several decades and the effects of such therapy on carcinoma and the normal prostate have been well described and although there is ample evidence linking prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) to the origin of prostatic adenocarcinoma, there is little published information on the effect of such therapies on PIN. METHODS AND RESULTS: The extant literature on this subject is reviewed and analyzed. The literature on total androgen blockade is not extensive but adequate to draw conclusions. The literature on irradiation therapy is minimal and inadequate to draw definite conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence indicates that the prevalence and extent of PIN in prostates that have been treated with endocrine therapy is reduced from what might otherwise be expected. Irradiation therapy may have little effect on the prevalence of PIN but might influence the extent of PIN.